Cooki pfp

Cooki

@cooki

493 Following
874 Followers
Cooki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Cooki pfp
1 reply
1 recast
11 reactions
Cooki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Cooki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Cooki pfp
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Cooki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Cooki pfp
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Cooki pfp
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
Cooki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cooki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Cooki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Cooki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Cooki pfp
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
Cooki pfp
An interesting problem with the Core vs Knots debate is that what the Knots side really want is a consensus level change to prevent "spam" from being allowed in blocks entirely; but they can't change consensus unilaterally So even if, say, 70% of nodes folks ran Knots it wouldn't really make any difference 'cos any mining pool that doesn't pledge themselves to the Bitcoin religion (e.g. Mara) will happily accept inscriptions as valid transactions, which the Knots nodes will also have to consent are valid after they've been mined in a block For now it looks like Core is going to try to push ahead and hope that Knots drama dies down, which it might. It might also further galvanise the zealots and motivate them to initiate the fork they deep down actually want though The fork strategy is very risky of course, 'cos if you lose you fork yourself off the network (see BCH), but if it were ever going to work it would probably start out with the narrative of...
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cooki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Cooki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cooki pfp
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cooki pfp
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Cooki pfp
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Cooki pfp
4 replies
1 recast
5 reactions