One of the main talking points against L2s is that they are taking execution fees away from Ethereum. What if they burned a portion of their execution fees? Then they’ll be contributing more to the ecosystem. But tbh, no L2 will actually do this tho. Just thinking out loud here. Curious to hear your thoughts.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Gm 👋 I wrote an article on implementing KZG polynomial commitment scheme in Python. Would deeply appreciate your thoughts on it. 🫡 https://mirror.xyz/cleanpegasus.eth/o0kpjWrwQBkNLXrnUrMJ4-QY-gJJTJRON9luOprisoE
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 6 reactions
I don’t understand why people are against too many rollups. Of course there’s going to be too many rollups. That’s the scaling plan🤷. The problems we need to solve like liquidity fragmentation, Bridging, UX are still the same either we have 5 rollups or 50 rollups. And you know what? Most L2s will never fully decentralize. And that’s fine. We are going to have 500 different rollups with different trust assumptions and various stacks. That’s completely alright. Not every project needs Ethereum level security and decentralization. If you don’t like it then stick to the few rollups that do fully decentralize(@arbitrum @optimism @base.base.eth @zksync are on track to get there). Look. Having many rollups is good for the ecosystem. We can try various ideas and see what works. We already have so many dope stuff like MegaETH, OP superchain, Arbitrum, various ZK stacks, etc. So quit whining. Super bullish
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 1 reaction