btc holder
25 Followers
@rish Could you provide more updates on Clanker? There are rumors circulating that you intend to halt Clanker’s buyback mechanism. While the community has no comment regarding the Farcaster acquisition, many Clanker holders are closely watching the project's progress. A lot of holders joined specifically because they trusted the buyback mechanism and believed in Clanker’s long-term vision. Would changing the mechanism so lightly really be in the best interest of the majority? As a crypto investor, I fully realize we aren't in a position to dictate how the project is run, but I believe we at least deserve the right to know and transparency. If you are planning to stop the buybacks, please disclose this immediately. That is the only fair outcome for the majority.
I do not even know how to reply him. This guy regards himself as "Third party" when he just announce the acquisition of Clanker.
Rish, thanks for the reply. To be clear, I’m not 'mad' at anyone—I'm simply asking reasonable questions about the asset you reportedly acquired. honestly, I’m quite surprised you define yourself as a '3rd party' in this context. Given the acquisition news, the community naturally views you as the new steward, not an outsider. The hostility feels unnecessary when we just want clarity. I’ve noticed that many people asking about Clanker are actually quite polite and friendly, yet your responses are consistently aggressive. I genuinely don't understand where this hostility is coming from. Anyone still holding Clanker at this stage is a loyal Farcaster user. Why treat your own users as the enemy?
lets build!!