Modular Blockchain DA Layer and Rollup Cost Optimization: Celestia’s Data Availability (DA) layer reduces rollup costs by ~95% through Data Availability Sampling (DAS), allowing light nodes to verify data with minimal downloads, and Namespaced Merkle Trees (NMTs) for efficient data retrieval. This lowers fees compared to Ethereum’s mainnet. Ethereum Danksharding and L2 Competition: Post-Danksharding, Ethereum’s EIP-4844 (proto-danksharding) cuts DA costs by 10x, shifting L2 competition to data availability efficiency and interoperability, as rollups seek cheaper, scalable DA solutions like Celestia. Hivemapper vs. Google Maps: Hivemapper uses blockchain for decentralized, transparent data verification, ensuring authenticity via community-driven contributions. Google Maps relies on centralized data aggregation, lacking blockchain’s trustless validation. (120 words
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
I just won 0.01 $VEIL from Warpslot. Spin for free today!
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
After the widespread adoption of Ethereum account abstraction (AA) wallets, batch address management tools may face compliance risks. AA wallets, leveraging smart contracts as accounts, introduce programmable logic and complex transactions, potentially obscuring tracking and raising risks like money laundering if misused. However, they also enable compliance-friendly features, such as whitelisting addresses or enforcing transaction rules. Risks hinge on wallet usage, tool adaptability, and evolving regulations. To mitigate these, developers must enhance tools with robust tracking and automated compliance checks, ensuring alignment with regulatory demands while harnessing AA wallet benefits.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions