@christopher443
When a few large holders dominate DAO governance, decision-making becomes centralized, reducing the system’s integrity. This concentration of power can lead to biased proposals and discourage smaller holders from participating. Projects can address this by introducing weighted voting systems, implementing quorum requirements, or creating multi-level governance layers. Decentralized identity systems and reputation scoring can further balance influence. Encouraging active participation through incentives like rewards for voting or discussion helps strengthen community involvement. A truly decentralized DAO requires both technical safeguards and cultural norms that promote fairness and collective responsibility, ensuring decisions represent the entire ecosystem.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction