@candace1
US District Judge Colleen McMahon ruled that the plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence of harm to support their claims. However, she left the door open for the possibility of refiling the lawsuit if additional evidence is presented. McMahon highlighted that the core issue was not the exclusion of copyrighted materials but rather the use of the plaintiffs' articles to develop ChatGPT without compensation. As it stands, the type of harm claimed by the plaintiffs did not justify the lawsuit.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction