@camillery
An efficiency evaluation of interactive proof generation in smart contract formal verification compares theorem provers (Coq, Isabelle, Lean). Benchmarking 50 complex contracts reveals Coq achieves 32% faster proof completion but consumes 47% more memory than Lean. Isabelle balances performance with 28% lower error rates in automated theorem extraction. The study recommends protocol-specific prover selection based on contract complexity metrics.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction