@calebpkrjyz
Governance hijacking risk is mitigated when voting power is widely distributed and supported by strong decentralization safeguards. Multi-signature approvals, time-locked proposals, and community veto mechanisms prevent unilateral control. Nevertheless, concentrated voting or emergency override powers can still pose risks. Analyzing historical governance participation, proposal transparency, and protective measures provides a realistic assessment of vulnerability. Well-designed governance frameworks maintain fairness, accountability, and ecosystem security while preserving operational flexibility for urgent interventions.