I just want enough Farcaster rewards so I can buy a dishwasher

Farcaster-native research: https://paragraph.xyz/@matthewb | prev. Juicebox, Nouns, RAW DAO | casting about coffee, hi-fi, and other rabbit holes

yes babe lets have another flood and have the landlord get annoyed when we ask for blowers so we don’t get mould while the drywall disintegratses 🥰

🔍 ensdata.net ✦ 𝙽𝙾𝚆: design engineer @family ✦ 𝙿𝚁𝙴𝚅: @rainbow 🌈 ✦ 𝙱𝚄𝙸𝙻𝙳𝙸𝙽𝙶: @vision

Taste Buds

montreal

finding god is getting the corner table at Osmo with the AC when it’s packed

Karaage sando with lettuce, tomatoes, jalapeños and onions on Japanese milk bread at the one and only, Osmo 🖤

/salty /fufu
•
moment recorder without border
•
QmRU7QqDBJGxwxT1CV4s66PBTEU1VtoKzpEpp2K21ztdJp

I think if we got a dog @brileigh would make pet video content pretty much 24/7

who needs a dishwasher when you could have a dog

Farcaster

Believer, husband, dad, optimist // Strategy & design at Crema // Expert dabbler // Steward of /pony /midwest /aethletics tylerhilker.com

strawberry rhubarb lemonade in the sunshine 🍓🍋

Law & Policy

for anyone who isn't familiar with Roman's case, he is one of the developers who built a privacy tool on ethereum called Tornado Cash.

ethereum is a public blockchain and there are many reasons why you might need a tool like TC. for example, you don't want your employer or friends to know how much money you have. or you want to donate to a political cause anonymously. this all boils down to the same thing: everyone deserves privacy because privacy is a human right.

the DoJ is arguing that because bad actors may have used TC for illicit purposes, the developers should be held liable despite 1) not being able to alter deployed smart contracts 2) not having custody of user funds.

as a developer, this matters because it sets legal precedent for you to be charged for the actions of third parties. for example, say you build a miniapp that lets users earn yield on their stables. if a criminal or illicit organization uses your miniapp, you could be held liable for their actions.

as a user, this matters because 1) fewer crypto apps will be developed due to increased legal risks 2) your right to self-custody is weakened which could lead to future bans 3) privacy tech for public blockchains will never be built as it's effectively deemed illegal.

put simply, Roman's case will make DeFi illegal. it will set precedent for Aave, Uniswap, and every other non-custodial crypto app to be considered illegal in the future on the basis of "money laundering" or illicit use by a third-party. this should scare the shit out of every single person in this industry, especially as political winds may soon blow in another direction. we can't allow these charges to stand.

This is a good simmary by @matthewb about why anyone on Farcaster should even care about Roman or his case

first year students will say it’s scanned that way ~on purpose~

I am counting the days until some mfa student makes some text installation with a Q&A @grok explain

You can now contribute to Roman Storm’s legal defense fund through a Farcaster mini app. The Ethereum Foundation is matching up to $750K in donations from the community

You can now contribute to Roman Storm’s legal defense fund through a Farcaster mini app. The Ethereum Foundation is matching up to $750K in donations from the community

https://give.warpcast.com/causes/defend-roman-storm

dreaming

backend eng; full-stack curious

writer, icon, retired rave queen

respectfully, what the actual fuck grok??

@networkspirits it’s always the ones who wouldn’t survive a close up speaking on angels

your safety is worth more than people on the internet knowing if you're hot

hope this helps

thelema

feel this big time 
https://x.com/networkspirits/status/1936012242618667252?s=46&t=rLftPKNSWRVHZOADuhmSqA

if I had money to burn I would hire someone to write my casts

prev /juicebox | helping free roman and alexey