keccers
@keccers.eth
The fully doxxed have more skin in the game than the pseuds, which is why it’s perplexing to me how in many instances pseuds are more easily able to accrue trust A pseud’s opinion should be doubly discounted. They have no reputation risk
25 replies
7 recasts
99 reactions
agusti
@bleu.eth
in the market of ideas reputation is earned by being interesting or right consistently many scammers use the -i’m doxxed excuse to lure you in and divert from their scamming, A pseudonym doesnt necessarily mean much i use my real name for example, i just dont think im famous enough for that to matter to anyone online
4 replies
0 recast
17 reactions
keccers
@keccers.eth
I can’t dump my name and get a new one the same way you can with a pseud If Proxy was doxxed he wouldn’t have been able to rinse and repeat Yes all people are bad and deserving suspicion docxed and not doxxed alike But to me the burden of proof should be higher with a pseud, if that makes sense
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
agusti
@bleu.eth
yeaj, that does make sense. and i thought about proxy too you’re right, but it’s just another data point on someone’s rep. obviously harder to trust an anon/pseudanon account. but i just dont trust, generally. the delta being doxxed of trust you earn from me is small at the end of the day is all about track record, and how much i think i know your charqcter over time. not just identity
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
keccers
@keccers.eth
Yes, all I am saying is that you have to approach a pseud with double the scrutiny, but we often instead give half I give people credit for being doxxed, more than you for sure
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
