@bellehobson
Governance activity reflects community engagement and project evolution, but both quantity and quality matter. High proposal counts without substance may indicate noise rather than meaningful progress. Quality proposals—well-researched, actionable, and addressing strategic or technical issues—demonstrate active participation and robust decision-making. Active, thoughtful governance signals a resilient ecosystem capable of adapting to challenges, resolving conflicts, and improving functionality over time. Conversely, sparse or low-quality governance suggests weak community involvement or limited project maturity. Tracking voter turnout and implementation success further enhances insight. Ultimately, governance vitality is a composite metric, combining proposal quality, community participation, and real execution, providing a clearer measure of a project’s long-term sustainability and decentralized operational strength.