NFTs have evolved into at least four categories. First, there are name NFTs like yourname.eth. These are the easiest to understand because they are just like domain names or usernames. Next, there are profile NFTs like Bored Ape. These have value because they are like club memberships, and people make them part of their public identity. Next, there are Zora-style content coins like horse (see reply), which update the art NFT model by setting up a market for every Instagram-style post. Buyers buy these coins to show appreciation for the creator, to speculate on how much more popular a given post will get, and sometimes to show (via onchain timestamps) that they’re early to spotting new talent. Finally, there are micro-NFTs that just represent onchain data, akin to “typed likes”. Many social actions are now cheap enough to record onchain.
balajis avatar
The innovation of @zora style content coins over 1-of-1 art NFTs is simply that there is always a buyer, at *some* price, for a content coin. Because they have Uniswap as the buyer. Whereas art NFTs are much more illiquid — so you can buy, but it’s harder to sell. Moreover there can be as many buyers of a Zora-style content coin on a post as there are viewers. [1]: Horse is a viral mint by @jacob that illustrates what Zora could be. A monetized Instagram.
Buy
13
17
139
Igor Yuzovitskiy avatar
“There’s always a buyer” key point, for 3 years NFTs have tried to implement some form of this. Zora’s flawless execution of this model should be studied
1
5
0xLuo avatar
Zora’s ERC20 contentcoins currently have good liquidity, but the question is whether they can still be considered NFTs. I think their earlier ERC20z model, which allowed tokens and NFTs to be swapped, was a more direct solution to NFT liquidity. Moreover, Sudoswap has explored similar ideas, and Blur improved liquidity by encouraging offers.
1
1
Kaloh | Indexy.xyz 📊 avatar
What about "ART" NFTs? Fidenzas, Ringers, Refik's? These are equally or even more valuable than Apes and aren't pfps or club memberships.
4
1
27
Zach Lipp avatar
I was also wondering where art NFTs fit into those categories
6
Joe Petrich 🟪 avatar
You're missing the most traded type of NFTs, tokenized physical collectibles on platforms like Courtyard.io.
Courtyard.io | Digital Packs, Physical Cards. Vaulted and insured.
courtyard.io
Courtyard.io | Digital Packs, Physical Cards. Vaulted and insured.
2
13
Nandit Mehra avatar
Great to see growth of courtyard
2
typeof.eth 🔵 avatar
Nit, but Zora style content coins aren’t NFTs as they’re explicitly fungible. Horse is an ERC-20 that is associated with a piece of media. Or to say it the other way, it’s a piece of media tokenized as an ERC-20 Does this matter to a layperson? Probably not!
1
11
tokenfox avatar
I agree with this take NFTs stand for non-fungible tokens. Its a crime to say fungible tokens are NFTs
amelielasker.eth avatar
Fifth there are media NFTs like /alexandria and /tortoise where people can build their digital bookshelves and vinyl collections
1
9
Kaloh | Indexy.xyz 📊 avatar
cool stuff!
Peter avatar
NFTs are the most underrated tech in crypto imo. The overfinancialization of NFTs stalled its innovation. Tokens-as-an-index is a (over)simplified explanation of how to look at it. I see future of NFTs as qualitative force to blockchains. Focus has currently been on the network improvements - next stages of innovation will include NFTs enriching wallets and accounts with attributes and depth - enabling more personalized experiences.
1
2
knivez.eth avatar
I thought for sure we were going to see a triple-A game using NFT's by 2020. I was convinced people would be trading skins and weapons on consoles by then.
1
Peter avatar
I worked in web3 gaming for a bit 🙂 The challenge with assets in NFTs is that its really hard to make interoperable. Balancing game economies is already hard enough - balancing a global supply with no control is hard for many games. With no operability, its just a very expensive game asset with high overhead 😔
1
Redy avatar
Dynamic art is something to put in thoughts as well
2
William Mougayar avatar
How about NFTs that change their properties based on conditions or actions. Dynamic NFTs. Eg event ticket or inside a game.
2
megabyte avatar
Are social actions by bots worthy enough to be coined on @zora for generating some side revenue? or is this something always tied to the social image of the creator?
2
Callum Wanderloots ✨ avatar
Also real world asset NFTs, backed by something in the physical world
2
0xdesigner avatar
that last one sounds important. examples?
1
Garrett avatar
farcon tickets
1
Catch0x22 avatar
strongly suggest artists 100x the micro use zora type coins lock you to a platform, use it as distro and don't take it seriously profile NFTs are largely untapped imo. think brands like doodles are much higher EV than BAYC. until i see a major political party run by someone using one of these as a pfp i think there's a tonne of potential cc: @lambchop wen PFP collection name NFTs are lowkey the most centralised thing in crypto last I checked but they are fun
2
1
lambchop ⊹ design ࣪ ˖ avatar
zora confusing
1
Catch0x22 avatar
yup it is over hyped can poke holes in most of the ideas presented here. like what is an "instagram style post" ppl post heaps of different stuff on every platform
1
lambchop ⊹ design ࣪ ˖ avatar
what’s different between zora and rodeo
1
Sky (funky Farcaster friend) avatar
How about NFTs representing every single non-fungible financial asset or physical asset? On-chain and real world tokenized assets. Basic example is every single Uniswap v3 and v4 LP position. Other real world asset example are the collectible cards on Courtyard or the wine via digital corks on Club dVIN
2
1
Sky (funky Farcaster friend) avatar
🍷
dVIN Labs (🍷, ⛓)
@dVINLabs
Unifying the $1T wine asset class through data, DePIN and RWA tokenization.
LazyFrank avatar
I see no reply fam. Type faster! 💨
1