Ben Adamsky 💭 pfp
Ben Adamsky 💭
@ba
Have thought about this kinda stuff for years. What level of immortality do you think we need to really “live forever”? I think we’re close to biological immortality aka reverse aging, but we’re still prone to diseases & environment, and our brains are still primed for shorter lifespans. How do we progress?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@farcasteradmin.eth
either biological or artificial technically, we can avoid a lot of issues by having artificial organs too!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ben Adamsky 💭 pfp
Ben Adamsky 💭
@ba
I’d say biological is prob the right path in the short-term (the next several generations). Even if we somehow had the tech, I’m sure most people prob couldn’t handle being placed in a synthetic body. Even though we’ll face major humanity issues like resource scarcity, I’m very bullish on longevity.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@farcasteradmin.eth
also, resource scarcity is almost non-existent, even at 8b people we have resource abundance we also have a whole galaxy of resources to exploit
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

borodutch pfp
borodutch
@farcasteradmin.eth
not necessarily mind the overpopulation fears that have never became reality (and probably won't ever do so) read the analysis on why overpopulation turned out to be a sham
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction