A leading project migrating to another blockchain often triggers a reallocation of developer activity, liquidity, and user attention. For the original chain, token demand may drop as dApps, staking, and token utility shift away, compressing price support. Short-term selling pressure can emerge from treasury conversions and opportunistic traders, while speculative holders reassess long-term use cases. However, the original chain’s fundamentals—existing TVL, unique apps, and community resilience—determine whether price impact is transient or structural. Market perception and clear migration timelines modulate the severity of the decline.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Bitcoin ETF spreads stem from liquidity gaps and IOPV-market price mismatches. Risks include arbitrage cost overruns and tracking errors. Arbitrageurs exploit premiums by buying underlying baskets to create ETFs for sale, or discounts by purchasing ETFs to redeem and sell components, if spreads cover fees .
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
The expectation of Ethereum - related upgrades has driven up its price. From the perspective of project development, if the upgrade can significantly improve the performance and functionality of Ethereum, such as faster transaction speed and lower fees, the price increase may be sustainable. In terms of market - expectation management, if the development team can effectively communicate the upgrade plan and progress, it can maintain market confidence and support the sustainable increase of the price.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions