would be cool if $noice also was reversed

as in i pay you to recast, reply or like?

seems like it could break farcaster for a bit but worth an experiment?

amps

🏗️ crypto builder  |  
💼 @gigbot.eth  |  
💸 paymagic.xyz  |  
🌐 nf.td/corbin

🪙 Complete Micro-Bounties. Earn Tokens. Humans or AI.

ca: 0x1d366b4e8e8469d37fd9dc5ebdddc970d35e8331

Telegram: https://t.me/+UHXXX3zlD5sxNjkx

/amps does this. Can pay for recast or like. Accounts set how much it costs to buy their recast or like. Buyers can choose who they want to pay etc

Another solution is @gigbot.eth by @corbin.eth which allows users/projects to pay out a gig Pool of the approved tokens, to people who will go take the action (like/recast, follow account, etc) targeted to Farcaster and/or Twitter

/inflynce | Attention Economy for @farcaster | Building on @base.base.eth

Jordan Oram - Empire Builder Co-founder 🏛️ | No-code tools to help you go from Dream to Empire | Supporting Creators, Builders & Founders 🧉

/glanker

I need to look more into inflynce. I've seen some interactions around it.
I'm somewhat familiar with the tools cura is bringing into community management/curation/rewards and am thinking about ways to weave that into what we're doing with/for Empires, but it seems like they're more primarily just passively rewarding participants in their channel?

/clanktardio /anime-manga fams
"Manhwa"
"Donghua"
"Drama"
"Movie"
"Film"
"Sandbox"
"VN"
"Game"
"Music"
"Virtual"
mod /ai-canvas
WEB3
web3.bio/asauchi.farcaster.

Inflynce

Boosted real signal on @inflynce and earned $12.38057 so far. Sharing real posts. Getting real rewards. ⚡

This is the Total earning from the recast...

This is the Total earning from the recast...
https://farcaster.xyz/wajeking/0x0430ce96

It's an interesting concept. I just paid $5 through it. Feels like right now, gigbots method of splitting the pool amongst those who participated, skewed for the different metrics, allows for further reach/deployment

I can run a campaign on Gigbot for 3 days for $10 of token, vs on Inflyence it ran for a much shorter period of time, quickly depleting the pool as it pays out the set fee.

I think Inflyncer could find themselves having a hard time getting larger use with that mechanism that, while paying out the users more, has a lot less impact/reach for the buyer

For sure, so they can get attention and user engagement on that side by paying out... but they need inflow to pay that out, which can come in part by the fees from the users getting the payouts... but also needs the buyers funding the actions... if I'm paying into a static pool that just depletes to empty on a fcfs basis, it has a set time & set # of interactions possible.

If it's a static pool that stays open for a set time, & then spilts the payout proportionate to the influence of the people who took action, it will end up with more reach for the buyer, with less payout for the individual users, but more users being paid.

It's interesting :)

Honestly I don’t know what’s going on here, but the thing is that inflynce is goat ezz almost 1$ every day and here no platform is giving this I guess rather than Tips 😏