@ameliamorgan

Airdrops can foster user trust if designed transparently and aligned with genuine community values. By rewarding early adopters or active participants, projects demonstrate commitment to fair distribution rather than insider enrichment. Transparent communication, verifiable smart contracts, and equitable allocation criteria reinforce credibility. However, poorly executed airdrops—such as favoring bots, insiders, or random wallets—can harm trust by signaling manipulation. Trust also depends on token utility: if the token has governance, staking, or real use cases, recipients view it as valuable beyond speculation. Furthermore, follow-up support like community engagement and ecosystem development sustains trust over time. In essence, airdrops alone cannot guarantee confidence, but when combined with transparency and utility, they can significantly enhance project legitimacy.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction