@alexsotodigital / Alex Soto’s official website: https://alexsotodigital.eth.limo/
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
🔥Hot take: Most DAOs suffer from putting governance in the wrong places. The more decisions move through explicit governance, the more time communities spend deciding what should happen instead of making things happen. What if governance was embedded into the workflow instead? The hypothesis: DAOs become more effective when fewer decisions require explicit governance, and more decisions are embedded into clear workflows with strong defaults. Intent → Bounties → Execution → Verification → Learning Feedback welcome. 🤓 https://paragraph.com/@alexsotodigital/the-minimum-viable-institution
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 3 reactions
Most teams say they value collaboration, learning, trust, and shared infrastructure. But when it comes to compensation… we usually default to what’s easiest to measure. I’ve been exploring a simple question: **What would it look like to reward value more fully, not just output?** This article is an attempt to answer that. It proposes a practical model to: * recognize different types of contributions * make invisible work more visible * align incentives with how value actually emerges in teams It’s still experimental, but I think it could be useful for DAOs, cooperatives, and even more traditional organizations. Would love to hear what resonates (and what doesn’t). https://paragraph.com/@alexsotodigital/toward-a-value-based-compensation-system-for-daos?referrer=0x3cd5fEC7FA9827cf0d262D6be5421A61CF615794
- 0 replies
- 1 recast
- 1 reaction