"privacy" isn't a cypherpunk "narrative"

it is the normal thing

we can just call private chains normal chains

and everything else "transparent chains"

seeing each other's tx history / balances / spying on counterparties is the version that needs explanation or "narrative"

Really, all of cypherpunk / free software / ... is just trying to preserve boundaries that were unquestioned in the year 1900.

* Your device serves you, not some gov or corp overlord
* You can repair and modify your device to better serve you
* Your private conversations are private
* Your private money is private

It’s obvious, quicker for some people than others, what defines ones “private portion”. Yet somehow very thin ice beyond. Likely because of continuously evolving levels of perceived certainty surrounding the first quick definition of privates. Plurality of private vs privates is important to recognize. Both same?