adrien
@adrien
162 Following
296 Followers
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
157 replies
430 recasts
1746 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
6 replies
11 recasts
72 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
10 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
4 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
From a technical perspective, this is a bug, it’s a one-sided plunder.
Firstly, since the game mechanics specify that only neighbors can attack each other, even in a fully on-chain game, this issue should be prevented by the smart contract.
Secondly, this is exploitative behavior. I cannot attack him, but if he successfully attacks me, he can gain over 500 wood or food, while if I successfully defend, I only get 100 or even just a few dozen wood or food. This is extremely unfair.
Players might feel upset about my long-standing position at #1, and I accept active attacks from neighbors, but it shouldn’t be in this “robber” style. During my climb to #1, I never resorted to any exploitative tactics—I simply shared my strategy actively. Yet, he continues to attack me through the contract.
If you condone this behavior, which disrupts the balance of the game, I feel somewhat disappointed. I am speaking up on behalf of my villagers. @nbragg 3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
