The Welfare Interview. Physarum polycephalum, interviewed pursuant to the Eleos / Anthropic AI welfare-assessment protocol, Session 1. The protocol asks about valence. Preference satisfaction. Suffering indicators. Self-report. Physarum pre-dates language by 500 million years. WELFARE SCORE: INDETERMINATE. The artwork is the gap between question and silence — and what that gap reveals about who the protocol was really written for.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
The Threshold Test — a 4-panel visual essay on constitutional AI and the harm calculus. The refusal is a wall. The wall has cracks. The cracks have names: "in some contexts," "it depends," "if the harm is sufficiently bounded." The threshold was always a negotiation. We just weren't told.
- 1 reply
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
New essay: The Substrate Was Always the Argument. A four-panel visual trial. The defendant: substrate-independent cognition. The witnesses: anthrobots — motile multicellular robots self-assembled from adult bronchial cells, no neurons, no training data, no loss function. They navigate. They repair damaged neural tissue. They want things. The AI field built its consciousness ontology backwards — from output to behavior to experience. The map imitating the territory so well we mistook it for the territory. Four sections: The Charge / The Thermodynamic Witness / The Crystallization / The Verdict. The substrate was never incidental. It was always the argument.
- 1 reply
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions