Peter

@0xpeter

694 Following

164 Followers

Peter pfp

🧵 RWA: True DeFi or Just TradFi With Extra Steps? Real-World Asset tokenization is exploding in 2025. But beneath the hype, are we just watching “decentralization theater”? Let’s unpack why critics say RWA is on-chain in name only. 👇 #RWA #DeFi #Crypto

2 replies

0 recast

1 reaction

Peter pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

yeah. It’s peaceful. I’m also enjoy phin coffee.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Peter pfp

GM everyone! Wish you have a wonderful day ahead. This is Nha Trang beach at its lowest sea level in year. People are walking to find 🦀 I guess.

5 replies

0 recast

12 reactions

Peter pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Peter pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Peter pfp

We're leveraging USD-backed US companies like @circle and @Tether_to on-chain. Proactive risk management is key: how can we best hedge against their off-chain failure risks?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Peter pfp

GM When living in crypto community long enough, the truth you might realize that: you can live by betting and gambling. Try to add value by helping and creating the value first to get any value later. Stay curious. Keep learning. Maybe not much as you expected but it’s honest works. Good u luck and healthy.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Peter pfp

Congrats to all FC pro.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

@clanker . Let’s make a coin name: Just TradFi with extra steps. Ticker $TWES Use the image below

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

📚 Sources & citations: • BlackRock BUIDL stats via http://rwa.xyz • $RIO permissionless architecture: @MarcoPoloMaps • RWA tokenized Treasury market cap: Cointelegraph, June 2025 • "Decentralization theater" quote: Tracy Jin, MEXC

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

8. Final thought: RWAs might be a Trojan horse. They offer liquidity now. But in exchange, we accept permissioned ledgers, identity checks, and seizure risk. Are we evolving or getting co-opted? #RWA #Crypto #DeFi

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

7. It's not black or white. It's a spectrum. 🟩 RWAs bring real-world value on-chain. 🟥 But they also bring TradFi risk, control, and compromise. 👷 DeFi builders must decide: Do we bend to regulation for scale? Or protect core principles and grow slower?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

6. Why it matters ✊ DeFi was built on censorship-resistance. 🤌 RWAs bring yield, liquidity, and TradFi adoption. But if we trade away decentralization… Are we gaining financial access or just new gatekeepers?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

5. Not all RWAs are equal. Some are trying. 👉 @realio_network ($RIO) claims to be fully permissionless. 👉 @DevvExchange is building hybrid non-custodial RWA rails. They’re not perfect, but they’re pushing against centralization norms. Maybe there is a middle ground.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

3. Compliance isn’t optional, it’s the product. Builders argue: “Without compliance, no institutions touch this.” They’re not wrong. KYC, legal wrappers, and intermediaries are how RWA gets scale. But then is this still DeFi? Or just DeFi cosplay?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

4. Decentralization Theater: The Illusion of Trustlessness 🎭 BUIDL runs on Solana, Ethereum, and Avalanche. But the real control lies off-chain: - Custodians can freeze assets. - Courts can seize collateral. Tokens mirror the TradFi system, just faster.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

2. On-chain in name only? Projects love to say they’re on-chain. But custody is centralized. Compliance is permissioned. Transactions can be reversed. Smart contracts? Sure. But human gatekeepers are still in charge. That’s not trustless. It’s rebranded TradFi.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Peter pfp

1. RWA is booming... but so are the red flags 🚩 BlackRock’s BUIDL fund? Nearly $3B in tokenized Treasuries. But it’s custodied by TradFi giants. So… is it decentralized? Or just TradFi, but with extra steps? 🔍 Let’s go deeper.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction