@0xmamareza.eth

Yoooooo Hi @zama believers 💛 I'm here to break down part 14 of Zama Private Governance 🟨 Most DAOs ask you to vote in public, which invites pressure and signaling. With FHE on fhEVM, you get the opposite: votes stay encrypted, while the final tally is verifiable and auditable on-chain. how it works 🟡 • You encrypt your ballot client-side. • A lightweight proof shows it’s valid (right range, one-person-one-vote, membership) without revealing the choice. • Coprocessors aggregate encrypted ballots; the chain orchestrates + verifies the math, not your plaintext. • Policy decides visibility: only the tally opens; individual ballots never do. integrity & safety 🟡 • public verifiability: anyone can re-execute the encrypted tally and match the ciphertext result. • anti-bribery/coercion: you can’t prove how you voted. • audits when needed: threshold keys (via KMS nodes) can unlock minimal disclosures for disputes, never the whole dataset. why it matters🟡 governance gets honest signals without doxxing choices. In my opinion, this is how on-chain votes earn real legitimacy.

0 reply

0 recast

3 reactions